Course syllabus
Course PM
BBT010 Ethics in biotechnology lp1 HT2021 (7.5 hp)
The course is offered by the department of Biology and Biological Engineering in collaboration with the department of Technology Management and Economics
The course PM can be downloaded here.
Teachers and examiners:
Calle: Carl Johan Franzén (BIO) franzen@chalmers.se 772 3808
Karl: Karl de Fine Licht (TME) karl.definelicht@chalmers.se
Heidi: Heidi Carmen Howard (BIO/Lund Univ) heidiho@chalmers.se
Guest lecturers:
Henrik Aronsson henrik.aronsson@bioenv.gu.se
Yvonne Nygård yvonne.nygard@chalmers.se
Matty Janssen mathias.janssen@chalmers.se
Purpose and aims
Biotechnology has enormous potential for improving human health and providing sustainable solutions for providing nutrition, energy and chemicals to society. At the same time, many of these technologies interact with basic processes of life, may affect the personal integrity of individuals, and may have unclear effects on the environment. A problem is that technological innovation and its effects are hard to predict in detail, so decisions will have to be made under uncertainty.
The course aims to develop the students' understanding of ethical aspects that appear when biotechnologies are developed and applied. Students learn a systematic and nuanced way to reason around and to reach well-founded answers to questions regarding how society and individuals should act during the development and application of different technologies. The main emphasis is on the analysis of a number of cases by, among others, theories in normative ethics. Additionally, the course aims at making students aware of laws and rules that regulate biotechnical research and development activities.
Learning objectives
After completion of this course, the student should be able to:
- identify and critically discuss ethical issues that occur in biotechnology, orally and in writing in English;
- adequately apply basic moral philosophical theories and concepts on existing ethical problems;
- assess the validity and relevance of arguments that are used in the debate on ethics and biotechnology, argue for different standpoints and take position in a well-founded and transparent way;
- account for generally accepted and generic policies and guidelines for research ethics and professional ethics;
- in a nuanced way reflect on her/his professional role from an ethical perspective;
- account for laws, statutes and established routines that regulate experimental and industrial use of biological samples, animals and humans.
Study plan on the student portal.
Course-specific prerequisites
Biochemistry, cell and molecular biology, and microbiology corresponding to a bachelor's degree in biotechnology, bioengineering, or similar.
Course design: Organisation and teaching modes
The course is organized in the form of lectures, seminars and group work. Students are also expected to read relevant literature and other resources. Formative assessment of assignments is also an integral part of the course design.
Lectures are not compulsory but students are expected to be present or view recorded lectures. In 2021, lectures will be given on campus in lecture halls KA or KC (see schedule), with due respect to Covid-19 measures. The lectures will also be recorded.
Seminars and group work on Wednesday afternoons are compulsory. In 2021, due to Covid-19 risks, the seminars will be done digitally using Zoom (pwd Ethics010). Group work will be done in breakout rooms.
Most of the practical learning is expected to take place during the seminars, when students discuss specific cases in study groups and develop their analysis and argumentation skills. The student groups will be assigned by the teachers.
If a compulsory seminar is missed, the student will be given an individual assignment on the same topic as the missed seminar.
Examination
Examination is based on formative assessment, and consists of attendance at seminars, several hand-ins, a final quiz, and a final take-home essay-style exam.
Students must submit two group assignments, consisting of ethical analyses in the form of essays on a specific biotechnological topic, and on a topic within the scope of the professional role in research and development. These essays should be written by groups of three to five students, assigned by the teachers.
For each of these assignments, students are required to submit 1) a brief individual draft argument as preparation for the group work; 2) the actual group assignment report; 3) an individual peer review of a text written by another group; and 4) a revised group assignment report. Students will receive formative feed-back on the assignment report, and on the ethical analyses therein, from the teachers and other students, via the peer reviews. The revised report will be graded by the teachers, but that grade is only for information and learning; it will not be included in the final grade. Detailed instructions and an evaluation form will be given with the assignments.
Grading is based on a final take home exam. The take-home exam must be written individually, that is, all forms of communication, collaboration and discussion on the take home exam questions are prohibited. The exam consists of two parts. The main part is an essay on an ethical problem relevant to a given topic within biotechnology. The second part is a multiple choice test on rules, regulations and academic integrity.
Students are allowed to use all sources of information when writing the essay and doing the multiple choice test, except discussing, in any mode, the exam with anyone except the teachers. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden; all essays will be assessed for plagiarism. All sources of information used in the essay must be adequately referred to.
To pass the course, students must answer at least 75% of the multiple choice questions correctly, and provide an adequate essay. Differentiation between grades 3, 4 and 5 will be done based solely on the essay.
Assessment criteria for the essay and expected style and format will be explained during the course.
The take home exam and quiz will be handed out on Wednesday, October 20, and must be submitted by 17.00 on Friday, October 29.
Overall schedule
Detailed course schedule
The complete schedule can be downloaded here.
LV |
Day |
Date |
Time |
Room |
What |
Title / Topic |
Teacher |
1 |
Wed |
Sep 1 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 1 |
Course introduction, contents and design. Ethical thinking and applied ethics with examples. Argument analysis |
Calle / Karl / Heidi |
Wed |
Sep 1 |
13:15-17:00 |
Ethics010 |
Seminar 1 |
Ethical thinking and applied ethics with examples. (1 h) Argument analysis, on biotechnological case (3 h) |
Karl / Calle / Heidi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Mon |
Sep 6 |
10:00-11:45 |
KC |
Lecture 2 |
Theory: Ethics and risk |
Karl |
Wed |
Sep 8 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 3 |
Theory: Normative ethics |
Karl |
|
Wed |
Sep 8 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 2 |
Normative ethics and ethics and risk with examples (3 h) Assignment 1, Biotechnological case (1 h) |
Karl / Calle / Heidi |
||
Sun |
Sep 12 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of individual drafts, Assignment 1. (More info will come) |
Student |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Mon |
Sep 13 |
10.00-11:45 |
KC |
Lecture 4 |
Plant molecular breeding and biotechnology, the scientist’s perspective |
Henrik Aronsson (GU) |
Wed |
Sep 15 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 5 |
Ethical aspects of GMO crops |
Karl |
|
Wed |
Sep 15 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 3 |
Work on Assignment 1. |
Karl / Calle / Heidi |
||
Wed |
Sep 15 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of Assignment 1 |
Student |
|
Sun |
Sep 19 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of peer review reports, Assignment 1. |
Student |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Mon |
Sep 20 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 6 |
CRISPR-Cas9, technology and applications. |
Yvonne Nygård (IndBio) |
Wed |
Sep 22 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 7 |
Ethical aspects of CRISPR-Cas9 methodology |
Heidi |
|
Wed |
Sep 22 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 4 |
Follow-up on Assignment 1. |
Karl / Calle / Heidi |
||
Wed |
Sep 22 |
17:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of revised Assignment 1 |
Student |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
5 |
Mon |
Sep 27 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 8 |
Theory of science. Science vs Pseudoscience. Popper, Häggström |
Calle |
Wed |
Sep 29 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 9 |
Research ethics. Academic conduct and misconduct |
Calle |
|
Wed |
Sep 29 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 5 |
Assignment 2. Research ethics and potential academic misconduct cases. |
Calle /Heidi / Karl |
||
Sun |
Oct 3 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of individual drafts, Assignment 2. |
Student |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
6 |
Mon |
Oct 4 |
10:00-11:45 |
KC |
Lecture 10 |
Ethical aspects of genetic screening and diagnostics |
Heidi |
Wed |
Oct 6 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 11 |
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
Matty Janssen (ESA, Chalmers) Not confirmed |
|
Wed |
Oct 6 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 6 |
13-15 Multi-criteria decision analysis, UN SDG, competition for resources (2 h) 15-17 Work on Assignment 2 |
Matty Janssen (ESA, Chalmers); Not confirmed Calle / Heidi / Karl |
||
Wed |
Oct 6 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of Assignment 2. |
Student |
|
Sun |
Oct 10 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of peer review reports, Assignment 2. |
Student |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Mon |
Oct 11 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 12 |
EU and Swedish regulations on laboratory work with GM microorganisms and plants, animals, humans. |
Calle |
Wed |
Oct 13 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 13 |
ELSI in student research projects: · The Chalmers iGEM team project 2021 · Research Project Proposals from earlier KBT090 students |
Calle |
|
Wed |
Oct 13 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 7 |
Work on Assignment 2 |
Calle / Heidi / Karl |
||
Wed |
Oct 13 |
18:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in of revised Assignment 2. |
Student |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Mon |
Oct 18 |
10:00-11:45 |
KC |
Lecture 14 |
Ethical leadership: Conflict handling. Coaching, drivers, goal setting and “lethal leadership”. |
Calle |
Wed |
Oct 20 |
10:00-11:45 |
KA |
Lecture 15 |
Ethics policies; Engineer’s (and other) Code of Honour |
Calle / Heidi |
|
Wed |
Oct 20 |
13:15-17:00 |
Seminar 8 |
Chalmers Committee on Ethics and Research Misconduct. Main point: Ethical leadership: Master-suppression techniques and how to deal with them. (2 h) Introduction and hand-out of final exam cases. Q&A, Wrap-up of course. |
Calle / Heidi / Karl |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Fri |
Oct 29 |
17:00 |
Canvas |
Deadline |
Hand-in: Final exam and Multiple Choice Test |
Student |
Course literature
The course literature consists of handouts, on-line videos, scientific articles and book chapters referred to during the course. A list of links and documents can be downloaded here.
To avoid illegal copying, students must download required articles via the E-journals and E-books available at the Chalmers library homepage: http://www.lib.chalmers.se/.
Changes made since the last occasion
- Changed order of lectures and seminars.
- Updated content of some lectures and seminars.
- Restructured assignment submissions, including individual drafts and formative grading of revised reports to help students understand what is expected in the final exam.
- The list of literature, web resources and other sources of information has been updated.
Course summary:
Date | Details | Due |
---|---|---|