Course syllabus

Course-PM

PPU215 Research skills for engineering projects lp3 VT24 (7.5 hp) 

Course offered by the department of Industrial and Materials Science 

 

Thank you for participating in the PPU215 mini-conference. 

 

Contact details

TEACHING & COURSE ADMINISTRATION

Mélanie Despeisse (examiner Associate Professor melanie.despeisse@chalmers.se 
Cecilia Berlin Associate Professor cecilia.berlin@chalmers.se 
Peter Hammersberg  Senior Lecturer peter.hammersberg@chalmers.se 
Jon Bokrantz  Postdoctoral Researcher jon.bokrantz@chalmers.se 
Marco Schirone  Librarian and Researcher marco.schirone@chalmers.se 
Beate Granström Librarian and Lecturer beate.granstrom@chalmers.se 
Becky Bergman Senior Lecturer rebecca.bergman@chalmers.se 
Lena Bendrioua  Study Administrator lb@chalmers.se  

 

PROJECT TUTORS

Clarissa González  Postdoctoral Researcher  clarissa.gonzalez@chalmers.se 
Arpita Chari Doctoral Student arpitac@chalmers.se 
Greta Braun Doctoral Student greta.braun@chalmers.se 
Qi Fang Doctoral Student qifa@chalmers.se 
Henrik Söderlund Doctoral Student hensode@chalmers.se 
Huizhong Cao Doctoral Student huizhong@chalmers.se 
Silvan Marti Doctoral Student silvan@chalmers.se 

 

GUEST LECTURERS

Lars-Ola Bligård  Theory of Science  Chalmers, IMS Design & Human Factors
Cecilia Berlin Engineering Ethics  Chalmers, IMS Design & Human Factors
Lars Björklund  Corporate Ethics and Code of Conduct  Transparency International

 

COURSE REPRESENTATIVES

Contact details and course meeting minutes

 

Course purpose

This course is designed to align with the quality criteria and learning objectives for your Master's thesis work in year 2. 

The course aims to develop your professional and scientific skills by working on a research project to answer an open-ended research question. You will start by identifying an engineering problem and defining a research question which will form the basis for your group project. You will work in groups of 4-6 students to practice project planning, time management, teamwork, various forms of communication, and ethical considerations in engineering (professional development). You will answer your research question using a triangulated approach combining literature studies, quantitative and qualitative methods (scientific skills). At the end of the course, all groups will present their research project with a scientific paper and an oral presentation at the PPU215 mini-conference. 

 Research skills.png

 

Schedule

TimeEdit

Study period:  15 Jan – 17 Mar (Chalmers academic year)

Course Week
Date
Time
Room
Activity
1
Mon 15 Jan
08.00–11.45
HA3 *
Course & project introduction * (MD & BB)
Wed 17 Jan
10.00–11.45
13.15–17.00
HC1
HC1
Literature search (MS, BG)
Data collection & Stakeholder analysis (CB)
2
Mon 22 Jan
08.00–10.45
11.00–11.45
HA3
HA3
Theory of science (LOB)
Scoping and planning tools (MD)
Wed 24 Jan
10.00–11.45
13.15–17.00
HC1
HC1
Qualitative methods (JB)
Quantitative methods & JMP tutorials (PH)
3
Mon 29 Jan
08.00–09.45
10.00–11.45
HA3 
HA3
Project work, self-facilitated
Workshop 1: Exploratory Data Analysis (PH) 
Wed 31 Jan
10.00–17.00
Library /
Library session by appointment (MS, BG) / Project work 
4
Mon 5 Feb
08.00–11.45
HA3
Workshop 2: Fit Y by X (PH)
Schedule adaptations for the CHARM event on 6-7 Feb / Project work 
5
Mon 12 Feb
08.00–11.45
Library - språkunder /
Group dynamics discussion by appointment (BB) Project work 
Wed 14 Feb
10.00–11.45
13.15–17.00
HC1
ML11,13,15 *
Project work
Workshop 3: Catapult competition * (PH)
6
Mon 19 Feb
09.00–11.45
SB-H1
Engineering ethics (CB) 
Wed 21 Feb
10.00–11.45
13.15–15.00
15.15–17:00
HB1
HC1
HC1
Ethics in companies (LB) 
Research quality & troubleshooting (MD)
Project work
7
Mon 26 Feb
08.00–09.45
10.00–11.45
HA3
HA3
Conference paper / Presentation practice
Critical project evaluation (PH)
Wed 28 Feb
10.00–17.00
HC1  
Conference paper / Presentation practice
8
Mon 4 Mar
08.00–11.45
Paper peer reviews
Wed 6 Mar
10.00–17.00
HC1 *
PPU215 Conference *
ANNOTATION:  * Mandatory participation Self-study; (lecturers’ initials)

 

Course literature

 

Course design

This course uses an active learning approach (project-based) and progresses along two tracks: professional development and scientific skills. Both tracks will be explored and practised via a combination of activities centred around your group project. Each activity will equip you with tools and methods to build your ability to plan and execute a research project effectively.

Scientific skills. This track contains lectures and exercises focusing on the necessary theories and methods to conduct rigorous project work according to established quality criteria for generating scientific and engineering knowledge: theory of science, scoping, data collection, literature studies, quantitative methods and qualitative methods.

Professional development. This track is mainly composed of workshops and theme lectures on the following topics: project planning and time management, project meetings and teamwork, giving and receiving feedback, ethics in companies and ethics in engineering.

At the overlap of both tracks. You will also learn about how to reflect on the implications of your work and how to communicate your work effectively (oral, written and visual communication). 

 

Learning objectives and syllabus

1. Use a structured project methodology to apply knowledge and skills gained in university education.
2. Assess the need for scientific information, search for that information and critically evaluate its relevance.
3. Write a project proposal to define and scope open-ended research questions.
4. Select appropriate research methods to fulfil the project objectives, and critically evaluate the methods used with consideration to both scientific trustworthiness and ethical aspects.
5. Write a project report in the form of a scientific article conforming to academic standards of quality.
6. Perform a clear oral presentation of the project results that is well-suited to its intended audience.
7. Collaborate professionally in accordance with a project group's needs of structured management and task distribution with considerations for equality, diversity and inclusion in teamwork.
8. Give constructive feedback to group members and other groups on their work, and respond to feedback on your own group work.
9. Reflect on ethical aspects of engineering work, academic research and corporate codes of conduct, at different system levels. 

Link to the syllabus/study plan on Studieportalen.

 

Examination

The course examination is continuous as defined by the activities in the course schedule. Some elements are mandatory while others are not, but still highly recommended.

The group component, i.e. project work, is a major basis for the grade (60%) and involves organizing yourselves as a team, performing the required tasks for your project, and independently creating a well-supported scientific argument to answer your research question. This project work is mostly carried out outside of scheduled class time, but many lectures and exercises function as supportive activities towards the end goal.

The individual component of the course (40%) is used to adjust the personal grade level.

 

Grading rules:

  • You must hand in all mandatory assignments.
  • Some assignments are optional but highly recommended.
  • Late submissions for optional assignments are not accepted (not graded). 
  • Late submissions on mandatory assignments will result in malus points. 
  • Peer review is mandatory for the conference paper.

 

Individual component (max. 20 pts)

Group component (max. 30 pts)

* Registered presence & participation at mandatory activities in the schedule – Pass / Fail

* Self-assessment (x2) & member feedback (x2) – 8 pts

Quantitative exercises – 2 pts

Reflective essays (x2) – 10 pts

* Project proposal – Pass / Fail

Study design drafts (x3) – for feedback

* Conference paper + peer reviews – 20 pts

* Conference presentation – 5 pts

* Project management (weekly) – 5 pts

Note: * Assignments in red are mandatory

>>> You can find more information in the Assignment guide/Project PM <<<

 

Grading is individual and the grading scale is: 5, 4, 3, and Fail.

Grade levels

≥27 pts

≥35 pts

≥43 pts

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

 

Honesty and integrity

All students at Chalmers are expected to comply with the rules of the university (Academic Honesty and Integrity at Chalmers).

There is zero tolerance for cheating and plagiarism.

Course summary:

Date Details Due