Course syllabus
Course-PM
PPU215 Research skills for engineering projects lp3 VT24 (7.5 hp)
Course offered by the department of Industrial and Materials Science
Thank you for participating in the PPU215 mini-conference.
Contact details
TEACHING & COURSE ADMINISTRATION
Mélanie Despeisse (examiner) | Associate Professor | melanie.despeisse@chalmers.se |
Cecilia Berlin | Associate Professor | cecilia.berlin@chalmers.se |
Peter Hammersberg | Senior Lecturer | peter.hammersberg@chalmers.se |
Jon Bokrantz | Postdoctoral Researcher | jon.bokrantz@chalmers.se |
Marco Schirone | Librarian and Researcher | marco.schirone@chalmers.se |
Beate Granström | Librarian and Lecturer | beate.granstrom@chalmers.se |
Becky Bergman | Senior Lecturer | rebecca.bergman@chalmers.se |
Lena Bendrioua | Study Administrator | lb@chalmers.se |
PROJECT TUTORS
Clarissa González | Postdoctoral Researcher | clarissa.gonzalez@chalmers.se |
Arpita Chari | Doctoral Student | arpitac@chalmers.se |
Greta Braun | Doctoral Student | greta.braun@chalmers.se |
Qi Fang | Doctoral Student | qifa@chalmers.se |
Henrik Söderlund | Doctoral Student | hensode@chalmers.se |
Huizhong Cao | Doctoral Student | huizhong@chalmers.se |
Silvan Marti | Doctoral Student | silvan@chalmers.se |
GUEST LECTURERS
Lars-Ola Bligård | Theory of Science | Chalmers, IMS Design & Human Factors |
Cecilia Berlin | Engineering Ethics | Chalmers, IMS Design & Human Factors |
Lars Björklund | Corporate Ethics and Code of Conduct | Transparency International |
COURSE REPRESENTATIVES
Contact details and course meeting minutes
Course purpose
This course is designed to align with the quality criteria and learning objectives for your Master's thesis work in year 2.
The course aims to develop your professional and scientific skills by working on a research project to answer an open-ended research question. You will start by identifying an engineering problem and defining a research question which will form the basis for your group project. You will work in groups of 4-6 students to practice project planning, time management, teamwork, various forms of communication, and ethical considerations in engineering (professional development). You will answer your research question using a triangulated approach combining literature studies, quantitative and qualitative methods (scientific skills). At the end of the course, all groups will present their research project with a scientific paper and an oral presentation at the PPU215 mini-conference.
Schedule
Study period: 15 Jan – 17 Mar (Chalmers academic year)
Course Week
|
Date
|
Time
|
Room
|
Activity
|
1
|
Mon 15 Jan
|
08.00–11.45
|
HA3 *
|
Course & project introduction * (MD & BB)
|
Wed 17 Jan
|
10.00–11.45
13.15–17.00
|
HC1
HC1
|
Literature search (MS, BG)
Data collection & Stakeholder analysis (CB)
|
|
2
|
Mon 22 Jan
|
08.00–10.45
11.00–11.45
|
HA3
HA3
|
Theory of science (LOB)
Scoping and planning tools (MD)
|
Wed 24 Jan
|
10.00–11.45
13.15–17.00
|
HC1
HC1
|
Qualitative methods (JB)
Quantitative methods & JMP tutorials (PH)
|
|
3
|
Mon 29 Jan
|
08.00–09.45
10.00–11.45
|
HA3 ⁑
HA3
|
Project work, self-facilitated ⁑
Workshop 1: Exploratory Data Analysis (PH)
|
Wed 31 Jan
|
10.00–17.00
|
Library / ⁑
|
Library session by appointment (MS, BG) / Project work ⁑
|
|
4
|
Mon 5 Feb
|
08.00–11.45
|
HA3
|
Workshop 2: Fit Y by X (PH)
|
Schedule adaptations for the CHARM event on 6-7 Feb / Project work ⁑
|
||||
5
|
Mon 12 Feb
|
08.00–11.45
|
Library - språkunder / ⁑
|
Group dynamics discussion by appointment (BB) / Project work ⁑
|
Wed 14 Feb
|
10.00–11.45
13.15–17.00
|
HC1 ⁑
ML11,13,15 *
|
Project work ⁑
Workshop 3: Catapult competition * (PH)
|
|
6
|
Mon 19 Feb
|
09.00–11.45
|
SB-H1
|
Engineering ethics (CB)
|
Wed 21 Feb
|
10.00–11.45
13.15–15.00
15.15–17:00
|
HB1
HC1
HC1 ⁑
|
Ethics in companies (LB)
Research quality & troubleshooting (MD)
Project work ⁑
|
|
7
|
Mon 26 Feb
|
08.00–09.45
10.00–11.45
|
HA3 ⁑
HA3
|
Conference paper / Presentation practice ⁑
Critical project evaluation (PH)
|
Wed 28 Feb
|
10.00–17.00
|
HC1 ⁑
|
Conference paper / Presentation practice ⁑
|
|
8
|
Mon 4 Mar
|
08.00–11.45
|
⁑
|
Paper peer reviews ⁑
|
Wed 6 Mar
|
10.00–17.00
|
HC1 *
|
PPU215 Conference *
|
Course literature
- Lecture handouts
- Selected publications listed in the lecture handouts
- SAGE Research Methods: Research Tools (link in the top menu)
- Chalmers Library: Referencing guide using APA style
- Chalmers Writing Centre: Writing guide
- Additional material (optional)
- Denscombe, 2014. The Good Research Guide
- Booth et al., 2016. The Craft of Research
- Harvard University: A guide to group work
- University of Plymouth: A short guide to reflective writing
Course design
This course uses an active learning approach (project-based) and progresses along two tracks: professional development and scientific skills. Both tracks will be explored and practised via a combination of activities centred around your group project. Each activity will equip you with tools and methods to build your ability to plan and execute a research project effectively.
Scientific skills. This track contains lectures and exercises focusing on the necessary theories and methods to conduct rigorous project work according to established quality criteria for generating scientific and engineering knowledge: theory of science, scoping, data collection, literature studies, quantitative methods and qualitative methods.
Professional development. This track is mainly composed of workshops and theme lectures on the following topics: project planning and time management, project meetings and teamwork, giving and receiving feedback, ethics in companies and ethics in engineering.
At the overlap of both tracks. You will also learn about how to reflect on the implications of your work and how to communicate your work effectively (oral, written and visual communication).
Learning objectives and syllabus
1. Use a structured project methodology to apply knowledge and skills gained in university education.
2. Assess the need for scientific information, search for that information and critically evaluate its relevance.
3. Write a project proposal to define and scope open-ended research questions.
4. Select appropriate research methods to fulfil the project objectives, and critically evaluate the methods used with consideration to both scientific trustworthiness and ethical aspects.
5. Write a project report in the form of a scientific article conforming to academic standards of quality.
6. Perform a clear oral presentation of the project results that is well-suited to its intended audience.
7. Collaborate professionally in accordance with a project group's needs of structured management and task distribution with considerations for equality, diversity and inclusion in teamwork.
8. Give constructive feedback to group members and other groups on their work, and respond to feedback on your own group work.
9. Reflect on ethical aspects of engineering work, academic research and corporate codes of conduct, at different system levels.
Link to the syllabus/study plan on Studieportalen.
Examination
The course examination is continuous as defined by the activities in the course schedule. Some elements are mandatory while others are not, but still highly recommended.
The group component, i.e. project work, is a major basis for the grade (60%) and involves organizing yourselves as a team, performing the required tasks for your project, and independently creating a well-supported scientific argument to answer your research question. This project work is mostly carried out outside of scheduled class time, but many lectures and exercises function as supportive activities towards the end goal.
The individual component of the course (40%) is used to adjust the personal grade level.
Grading rules:
- You must hand in all mandatory assignments.
- Some assignments are optional but highly recommended.
- Late submissions for optional assignments are not accepted (not graded).
- Late submissions on mandatory assignments will result in malus points.
- Peer review is mandatory for the conference paper.
Individual component (max. 20 pts) |
Group component (max. 30 pts) |
* Registered presence & participation at mandatory activities in the schedule – Pass / Fail * Self-assessment (x2) & member feedback (x2) – 8 pts Quantitative exercises – 2 pts Reflective essays (x2) – 10 pts |
* Project proposal – Pass / Fail Study design drafts (x3) – for feedback * Conference paper + peer reviews – 20 pts * Conference presentation – 5 pts * Project management (weekly) – 5 pts |
Note: * Assignments in red are mandatory
>>> You can find more information in the Assignment guide/Project PM <<<
Grading is individual and the grading scale is: 5, 4, 3, and Fail.
Grade levels |
|
≥27 pts ≥35 pts ≥43 pts |
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 |
Honesty and integrity
All students at Chalmers are expected to comply with the rules of the university (Academic Honesty and Integrity at Chalmers).
There is zero tolerance for cheating and plagiarism.
Course summary:
Date | Details | Due |
---|---|---|